SCDSS v. McLamb

CourtListener 10151776Scctapp5 de mar. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Patricia McLamb and Richard McNeil, Defendants,

Of whom Patricia McLamb is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000785

Appeal From Lexington County
Huntley S. Crouch, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-071
Submitted February 18, 2021 – Filed March 5, 2021

AFFIRMED

Lyn Howell Hensel, of Law Office of Lyn Howell
Hensel, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Lillia Ann Gray, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of Lexington, for Respondent.
Thomas M. Neal, III, of Law Offices of Thomas M. Neal,
III, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Patricia McLamb appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McLamb's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.