CourtListener 10151730•SCDSS v. McCue
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Jeffrey T. McCue and Radina A. Franks, Defendants,
Of whom Jeffrey T. McCue is the Appellant
and
Radina A. Franks is a Respondent.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000958
Appeal From Charleston County
Alice Anne Richter, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-033
Submitted February 2, 2021 – Filed February 3, 2021
AFFIRMED
Heather Vry Scalzo, of Byford & Scalzo, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.
Christopher L. Murphy, of Murphy Law Offices, of
Charleston, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.
Sally R. Young, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of North Charleston, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.
Tina W. Dixon, of North Charleston, for Respondent
Radina A. Franks.
Alwyn Taylor Silver, of Silver Law Firm, LLC, of
Georgetown, as Guardian ad Litem for the minor child.
PER CURIAM: Jeffrey T. McCue appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McCue's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.