CourtListener 10151727•SCDSS v. Holder
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Carla Darlene Holder and Christopher Cunningham,
Defendants,
Of whom Carla Darlene Holder is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000427
Appeal From Pickens County
Karen S. Roper, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-038
Submitted February 2, 2021 – Filed February 5, 2021
AFFIRMED
Mary Elizabeth Parrilla, of The Parrilla Law Firm, LLC,
of Anderson, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
James C. Alexander, of Alexander Law Firm, LLC, of
Pickens, for the Guardian ad Litem for the children.
Nima Fiuzat, of Fiuzat Law Offices, P.C., of Clemson,
Guardian ad Litem for the appellant.
PER CURIAM: Carla Darlene Holder appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Holder's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.