Ryals v. State

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Cary G. Ryals, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000570

Appeal From Berkeley County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-016
Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed January 27, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Assistant Attorney General William Frederick
Schumacher, IV, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: After considering Cary G. Ryals's petition for a writ of certiorari,
this court granted certiorari on Ryals's request for a belated direct appeal pursuant
to White v. State, 263 S.C. 110, 208 S.E.2d 35 (1974), and we proceeded with our
review of the direct appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
After review, this appeal is dismissed. Counsel's motion to be relieved as counsel
for the direct appeal is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.