State v. Bearden

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State of South Carolina, Respondent,

v.

Harlin A. Bearden, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000752

Appeal From Greenwood County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-025
Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed January 27, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and In re the Care & Treatment of McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602
S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

THOMAS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.