SCDSS v. Dowd

CourtListener 10151400Scctapp27 de mai. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Michael R. Hatchell and Karlee Dowd (Deceased),
Defendants,

Of whom Michael R. Hatchell is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001847

Appeal From Lexington County
Robert E. Newton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-162
Submitted May 21, 2020 – Filed May 27, 2020

AFFIRMED

Nancy Carol Fennell, of Irmo, for Appellant.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Michael R. Hatchell appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hatchell's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.