CourtListener 10151362•State v. Evans
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Gene David Evans, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000365
Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-119
Submitted April 1, 2020 – Filed April 29, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellant Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and
Gene David Evans, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.