State v. Martinez

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nathan Daniel Martinez, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002494

Appeal From Richland County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-025
Submitted January 1, 2020 – Filed January 29, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and
Nathan Daniel Martinez, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted. 1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

THOMAS, GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.