SCDSS v. Chambers

CourtListener 10151190Scctapp1 de out. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Hayline Chambers and Anthony Hoey, Defendants,

Of whom Hayline Chambers is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-002001

Appeal From Cherokee County
Usha J. Bridges, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-322
Submitted September 11, 2019 – Filed October 1, 2019

AFFIRMED

Amanda Mange Scott, of Parnell & Parnell, P.A., of
White Rock, for Appellant.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Hayline Chambers appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Chambers's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.