State v. Freeman

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Fred Freeman, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001833

Appeal From Berkeley County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-200
Submitted May 1, 2019 – Filed June 5, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and
Fred Freeman, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted. 1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.