CourtListener 10150949•SCDSS v. Inabinett
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Tenetia Inabinett and Edward Alexander, III, Defendants,
Of whom Tenetia Inabinett is the Appellant,
and
Edward Alexander, III, is a Respondent.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2018-001045
Appeal From Lexington County
Dorothy Mobley Jones, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-122
Submitted March 7, 2019 – Filed March 25, 2019
AFFIRMED
Lyn Howell Hensel, of Law Office of Lyn Howell
Hensel, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.
Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Tenetia Inabinett appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Inabinett's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.