Hager v. Aspinwall

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Daniel Hager and Lindsey Hager, Respondents,

v.

Brittany Michell Aspinwall, Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001028

Appeal From Aiken County
Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-028
Submitted December 19, 2018 – Filed January 14, 2019

AFFIRMED

Donae Alecia Minor, of Minor Law Offices LLC, of Fort
Mill, for Appellant.

William Benito Fortino, of Moore Taylor Law Firm,
P.A., of West Columbia, for Respondents.

Kim Anderson Ray, of Law Office of Kim Anderson
Ray, LLC, of Aiken, as Guardian ad Litem for the minor
children.
PER CURIAM: Brittany Michell Aspinwall appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Aspinwall's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.