State v. Carson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timothy B. Cason, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001737

Appeal From Anderson County
R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-381
Submitted September 1, 2018 – Filed October 17, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.