CourtListener 10150741•SCDSS v. Gersh
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Katy Gersh and Joseph Goodrich, Defendants,
Of whom Katy Gersh is the Appellant
and
Of whom Joseph Goodrich is a Respondent.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000383
Appeal From Dorchester County
Anne Gue Jones, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-367
Submitted August 29, 2018 – Filed September 10, 2018
AFFIRMED
Mary Patricia Crawford, of Walterboro, for Appellant.
Brent Biagio Greenberg, of Greenberg Law Firm, LLC,
of Charleston, for Respondent Joseph Goodrich.
Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.
Mary Lee Briggs, of Charleston, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Katy Gersh appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Gersh's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.