In the Matter of Melvin Beam

CourtListener 10150531Scctapp11 de abr. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Melvin Beam,
Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002290

Appeal From Union County
R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-142
Submitted February 1, 2018 – Filed April 11, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and
Melvin Beam, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy,
360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.