CourtListener 10150101•State v. Terrell
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Brian Jacob Terrell, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-001020
Appeal From Lexington County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-216
Submitted April 1, 2017 – Filed May 24, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, and Brian Jacob Terrell, pro se, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.