SCDSS v. George

CourtListener 10149708Scctapp13 de jul. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Brandi Elaine George and Tony Lee Burnette,
Defendants,

Of whom Brandi Elaine George is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000319

Appeal From Greenville County
Kelly Pope-Black, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-362
Submitted June 17, 2016 – Filed July 13, 2016

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker, of Brandt Rucker Attorney At Law,
of Greenville, for Appellant.

Rebecca Rush Wray, of the Department of Social
Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Don J. Stevenson, of Don J. Stevenson, Attorney at Law,
of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Brandi Elaine George appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. Upon a thorough review of the
record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to
Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious
issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and
relieve George's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.