CourtListener 10149648•SCDSS v. Nelson
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
TyShema Nelson, Kevin Hairston, Eddie Williams, IV, Rodney
Sapp, Shawn Hairston, and John Doe, Defendants,
Of whom TyShema Nelson is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002633
Appeal From Dillon County
Michael S. Holt, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-270
Submitted May 5, 2016 – Filed June 3, 2016
AFFIRMED
Melvin Wayne Cockrell, III, of Cockrell Law Firm, P.C.,
of Chesterfield, for Appellant.
John D. McInnis, Jr., of John D. McInnis, Jr., Attorney at
Law, of Dillon; and Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville,
both for Respondent.
Jesse Stanley Cartrette, Jr., of Florence, for the Guardian
ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: TyShema Nelson appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2015). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Nelson's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, LOCKEMY, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.