SCDSS v. Pompey

CourtListener 10149256Scctapp2 de out. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Shukura Pompey, Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000661

Appeal From Dorchester County
Randall E. McGee, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-475
Submitted September 22, 2015 – Filed October 2, 2015

AFFIRMED

Marissa K. Jacobson, of Charleston, for Appellant.

Myra V. Whitener, of Charleston, and Deanne M. Gray,
of Summerville, both of the South Carolina Department
of Social Services, for Respondent.

Cassandra L. Hutchens, of Jamrosyk Law Firm, LLC, of
Charleston, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Shukura Pompey appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's order and relieve Pompey's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.