CourtListener 10148977•SCDSS v. Hooper
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Zena-Dawn Marie Hooper, Fred Lamont Walker, and
Tony Leron Abney, Defendants,
Of Whom Zena-Dawn Marie Hooper is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002732
Appeal From Greenville County
Alvin D. Johnson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-268
Submitted April 23, 2015 – Filed May 26, 2015
AFFIRMED
Matthew P. Head, of Head Law Firm, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.
Rebecca Rush Wray, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robert John Stephenson IV, of Robert J. Stephenson
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Zena-Dawn Marie Hooper appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hooper's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.