Outing v. Weeks

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Ashley Outing, Appellant,

v.

Velmetria Chante Weeks, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001300

Appeal From Marion County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-155
Submitted January 1, 2015 – Filed March 18, 2015

AFFIRMED

Everett H. Garner, of Holler, Garner, Corbett, Ormond,
Plante & Dunn, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. David Banner, of Aiken Bridges Elliott Tyler &
Saleeby, P.A., of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: A & I, Inc. v. Gore, 366 S.C. 233, 239, 621 S.E.2d 383, 386 (Ct. App.
2005) ("Where the circuit court has affirmed the magistrate court decision, this
court looks to whether the circuit court order is controlled by an error of law or is
unsupported by the facts." (internal quotation marks omitted)); Price v. Pickens
Cnty., 308 S.C. 64, 67, 416 S.E.2d 666, 668 (Ct. App. 1992) ("The burden is on the
appellant to provide a sufficient record such that this court can make an intelligent
review."); Windham v. Honeycutt, 290 S.C. 60, 64, 348 S.E.2d 185, 187 (Ct. App.
1986) ("This court will not consider facts that do not appear in the transcript of
record.").

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.