State v. Brown

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Hubert Brown, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001543

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-425
Submitted October 1, 2014 – Filed November 26, 2014

AFFIRMED

Appellant Defender Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson,
Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both
of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of
York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Brown, 402 S.C. 119, 125 n.2, 740 S.E.2d 493, 496 n.2 (2013)
("There are four basic requirements to preserving issues at trial for appellate
review. The issue must have been (1) raised to and ruled upon by the trial court,
(2) raised by the appellant, (3) raised in a timely manner, and (4) raised to the trial
court with sufficient specificity."); State v. Stone, 285 S.C. 386, 387, 330 S.E.2d
286, 287 (1985) ("[A] defendant's failure to object to the charge as made or to
request an additional charge, when an opportunity has been afforded to do so,
results in a waiver of his right to complain about the charge on appeal.").

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.