CourtListener 10148391•State v. Perry
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Darius M.Perry, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000067
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge,
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-089
Submitted January 1, 2014 – Filed March 5, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.