State v. Hampton

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Hampton, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000680

Appeal From Lexington County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-493
Submitted December 1, 2013 – Filed December 23, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan and John Benjamin Aplin, both of
the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole &
Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.