CourtListener 10148189•SCDSS v. Michelle G.
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Michelle G., Kenneth G., and Robert L., Defendants,
Of whom Michelle G. is the Appellant.
In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18
years.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000880
Appeal From Anderson County
Timothy H. Pogue, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-440
Submitted November 13, 2013 – Filed November 21, 2013
AFFIRMED
Carla Jane Patat, of Patat Law Firm, LLC, of Greer, for
Appellant.
Kathleen J. Hodges, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Brittany Dreher Tye, of Senerius & Tye, Attorneys at
Law, of Anderson, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Michelle G. appeals from the family court's removal order. See
S.C. Code 63-7-1660(E) (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.1
FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.