State v. Shaw

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Troy Shaw, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-208387

Appeal From Orangeburg County
Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-377
Submitted September 1, 2013 – Filed October 9, 2013

AFFIRMED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Sheppard, 391 S.C. 415, 420-21, 706 S.E.2d 16, 19 (2011)
("Our law is clear that a party must make a contemporaneous objection that is ruled
upon by the trial [court] to preserve an issue for appellate review."); State v.
Johnson, 363 S.C. 53, 58, 609 S.E.2d 520, 523 (2005) ("The objection should be
addressed to the trial court in a sufficiently specific manner that brings attention to
the exact error."); State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 694 (2003)
("A party may not argue one ground at trial and an alternate ground on appeal.").

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.