Robinson v. State

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Vincent A. Torres Robinson, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2010-164326

Appeal From Kershaw County
James R. Barber, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-269
Submitted May 1, 2013 – Filed June 19, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and
Vincent A. Torress, pro se, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant
Attorney General Brian T. Petrano, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the dismissal of his
application for post-conviction relief (PCR).
Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that
Petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we
grant the petition for writ of certiorari and proceed with a review of the direct
appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986).

Petitioner appeals the revocation of his probation. After a thorough review of the
record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Petitioner's
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.