SCDSS v. Linda S.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Linda J. S., Christopher D. S.,

Of whom Christopher D. S. is the Appellant,

In the interest of a minor child under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212653

Appeal From Greenville County
Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-113
Submitted February 4, 2013 – Filed March 13, 2013

AFFIRMED

Richard W. Allen, of The Law Offices of Richard W.
Allen, L.L.C., of Laurens, for Appellant.

Deborah Murdock, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of
Mauldin; and Rebecca Rush Wray, of the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, of Greenville, for
Respondent.

Robert Clark, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Christopher D. S. appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(2010 & Supp. 2012). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.