State v. Chavez

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Chavez, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2010-178649

Appeal From Oconee County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-637
Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 5, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant
Attorney General Brendan Jackson McDonald, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of
Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Rule 611(d), SCRE ("A witness may be re-examined as to the same
matters to which he testified only in the discretion of the court, but without
exception he may be re-examined as to any new matter brought out during cross-
examination."); State v. Stroman, 281 S.C. 508, 513, 316 S.E.2d 395, 399 (1984)
("The scope of redirect rests in the discretion of the trial court.").

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.