State v. Hallman

CourtListener 10147589Scctapp19 de dez. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Donald Hallman, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2010-168506

Appeal From Union County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-665
Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 19, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.