State v. Holston

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Darrin D. Holston, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-192326

Appeal From Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-678
Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 28, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant
Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., of Aiken, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: State v. Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001)
("[M]aking a motion in limine to exclude evidence at the beginning of trial does
not preserve an issue for review because a motion in limine is not a final
determination. The moving party, therefore, must make a contemporaneous
objection when the evidence is introduced.").

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.