CourtListener 10147501•State v. Douglas
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Eric Eugene Douglas, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-193448
Appeal From Spartanburg County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-567
Submitted October 1, 2012 – Filed October 24, 2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
John Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.