State v. Matthews

CourtListener 10147464Scctapp5 de set. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Antwine Lamar Matthews, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2010-161726

Appeal From Williamsburg County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
And D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-508
Submitted August 1, 2012 – Filed September 5, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Tristan M. Shaffer and Appellate
Defender Susan B. Hackett, both of Columbia; and
Antwine Lamar Matthews, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed1 after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.