State v. Smith

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Smith, Appellant.
__________

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes III, Circuit Court Judge
__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-452
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed July 18, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Eric Smith appeals his probation revocation, arguing
the circuit court erred in revoking probation because no evidentiary showing
of fact established the probation violations. After a thorough review of the
record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.