State v. Finklea

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mario Jarel
Finklea, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-408

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
4, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh,  Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese,
of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Mario Jarel Finklea, pled guilty to three
counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, three counts of
kidnapping, one count of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature,
and one count of burglary in the second degree.  The trial court sentenced him
to thirty years on each of the criminal sexual conduct and kidnapping charges,
and ten years each on the assault charge and the burglary charge, the sentences
to run consecutively.  Finklea’s
counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating
that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. 
Finklea did not file a separate pro se brief.  After a
thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.