State v. Johnson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bryant Johnson, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

Lee S. Alford,
Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-420

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October 8, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense,  of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office
of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville,
for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Bryant Johnson appeals his guilty pleas for two counts
of financial transaction card fraud over $500.00, one count of financial
transaction card fraud less than $500.00, and one count of financial card
theft.  He asserts his guilty plea failed to conform to the mandates set forth
in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Johnson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.