State v. Lang

CourtListener 10143024Scctapp11 de out. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Darrin Troy Lang, Appellant.

Appeal From Clarendon County

 Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-470

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
11, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellant Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Darrin Troy Lang appeals his conviction
of failure to stop for a blue light and sentence of eighteen months, suspended
upon the service of six months and two years probation.  He contends the trial
court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Lang’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.