CourtListener 10143010•State v. Brown
Texto completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Arkella Rena
Brown, Appellant.
Appeal from Richland County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-479
Submitted October 1, 2007 Filed October
12, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, of the Office of the Attorney General; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese,
all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Arkella Rena Brown pled guilty to shoplifting over $1000. She received three
years. On appeal, Brown alleges the plea judge erred in accepting her plea without
fully advising her of her constitutional rights. Brown did not file a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.