State v. Kitt

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kevin Hayes Kitt, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-500

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
29, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kevin Hayes Kitt (Appellant) was
convicted of possession of crack cocaine and possession of marijuana.  He was
sentenced to concurrent prison terms of ten years for the crack offense and one
year for the marijuana offense.  In addition, he was ordered to pay a fine. 

On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final brief along
with a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Appellant has not filed a pro se response.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition
to be relieved.         

APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1]  This case is decided without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.