CourtListener 10142980•State v. Sabo
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Steven A. Sabo, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-507
Submitted October 1, 2007 Filed October
30, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Steven A. Sabo pled guilty to entering a bank with the intent to
steal and nine counts of armed robbery. He was sentenced to twenty years
imprisonment. On appeal, Sabo argues his guilty plea was rendered conditional
as a result of the trial judge informing Sabo of his right to an appeal. After a thorough review of the record, counsels
brief, and Sabos pro se brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Sabos appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.