State v. Langford

CourtListener 10142781Scctapp29 de mai. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

DeMarco Langford, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-258

Submitted May 1, 2007 – Filed May 29, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Brian Austin Katonak, of Aiken; DeMarco Langford, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  DeMarco Langford entered guilty pleas to charges of:  possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, second offense; possession with the intent to distribute marijuana, second offense; and possession of a stolen pistol.  He was sentenced to:  ten years imprisonment and a $50,000 fine on the crack cocaine charge; ten years imprisonment and a fine of $10,000 on the marijuana charge; and five years imprisonment on the pistol charge.  The sentences were to be served concurrently.  He appeals.

After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Langford’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON , HUFF, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1]  Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.