State v. McCoy

CourtListener 10138478Scctapp8 de ago. de 2005

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Lawrence
McCoy,        Appellant.

Appeal From Marlboro County

Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 
2005-UP-479

Submitted August 1, 2005 – Filed August 8, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Dudek, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the
Attorney General, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant,
Lawrence McCoy, was indicted for and pled guilty to three counts of distribution
of crack cocaine, two counts of distribution of crack cocaine within a half mile
of a school or park, and one count of distribution of marijuana.  The trial
judge sentenced McCoy to concurrent terms of three years on the marijuana charge
and six years on each of the other charges.  McCoy’s counsel attached to
the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the
record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  McCoy did not file a
separate pro se brief.  We dismiss pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991).  Counsel’s petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON, HUFF, and WILLIAMS, JJ.,
concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.