State v. Dove

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED
BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

William David Dove,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Chester County

Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-109

Submitted February 1, 2005 – Filed February
11, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor John R. Justice, of Chester, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  William David Dove appeals
his guilty pleas to several counts of second-degree burglary, forgery, and grand
larceny, and one count of malicious injury to personal property.  Counsel for
Dove attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Dove
did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Dove’s appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.