State v. King

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED
BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Derron Jermaine King, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-030

Submitted January 1, 2005 – Filed January
13, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda P. Haile, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Derron Jermaine King entered guilty pleas under North
Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), to two counts of armed robbery and
one count each of second-degree burglary, criminal conspiracy, and possession
of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime.  King appeals.  Counsel
for King attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. 
King filed a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable
on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss King’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.