State v. McCrea

CourtListener 10137979Scctapp3 de dez. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED
ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Torrance McCrea, Appellant.

Appeal From Williamsburg County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-604

Submitted December 1, 2004 – Filed December 3, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Torrance McCrea was convicted of murder, assault and battery
with intent to kill (ABIK), possession of a weapon during the commission of
a violent crime, and discharging a firearm at or into a dwelling or occupied
structure.  He was sentenced to thirty years for murder, twenty years for ABIK,
five years for possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime,
and ten years for discharging a firearm, to be served concurrently.  McCrea’s
appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from
representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable
merit.  McCrea filed a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We
decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.