CourtListener 10137978•State v. Moore
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED
ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
DeWayne Moore, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
Marc H. Westbrook, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-602
Submitted December 1, 2004 Filed December 3, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dewayne Moore pled guilty to
second-degree burglary (violent), assault and battery of a high and aggravated
nature, and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature, pursuant
to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). He was sentenced to
fifteen years for burglary and ten years, concurrent, for each assault charge.
Moore appeals, arguing his guilty plea did not comply with the mandates set
forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). On appeal, counsel
for Moore has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting
permission to withdraw from further representation. Moore filed a pro
se response.
After a thorough review of the record pursuant
to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.