State v. Workman

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Amy R. Workman,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-568

Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November 15, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Amy R. Workman,
was indicted for and convicted of distribution of crack cocaine.  The trial
judge sentenced Workman to five years imprisonment.  Workman’s counsel attached
to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed
the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Workman has not filed a separate
pro se brief.  We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991).  Counsel’s petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, BEATTY ,and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.