CourtListener 10137854•State v. Brewington
Texto completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Raymond Brewington,
Appellant,
Appeal From Anderson County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-516
Submitted October 1, 2004 Filed October
14, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne D. White,
of Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Raymond Brewington appeals
his conviction for making a false claim to an insurance company about a proof
of fire loss. Brewington argues the trial court erred in denying his motion
for a mistrial following testimony by an insurance company agent regarding the
companys request for examinations of Brewington and his wife under oath. Brewingtons
counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating
that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After
a thorough review of the record and counsels brief, pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Brewingtons appeal and grant counsels motion
to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.