CourtListener 10137817•State v. Green
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
John Jabar Green, Appellant.
Appeal From Georgetown County
Paula H. Thomas, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-464
Submitted September 14, 2004 Filed September 15, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Mr. Green appeals after pleading guilty
to assault with the intent to kill (AWIK), and two counts of pointing and/or
presenting a firearm. The trial court sentenced him to eight years on the AWIK
charge and five years suspended on time served and three years probation on
the presenting charges. On appeal, Green argues his guilty plea failed to comply
with the requirements set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Greens counsel
attached a petition to be relieved stating that he has reviewed the record and
found the appeal to be without merit. Green did not file a separate pro
se brief.
After a thorough review of the record pursuant
to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]
GOOLSBY, ANDERSON, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.