CourtListener 10137791•State v. Brown
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Travis Brown,
Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
A. Victor Rawl, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-488
Submitted September 15, 2004 Filed
September 21, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Travis Ray Shelton Brown pled
guilty to failing to stop for a blue light, second-degree burglary, and two
counts of armed robbery. He was sentenced to three years for failure to stop
and fifteen years for armed robbery and second-degree burglary, all to run concurrent.
Brown appeals, arguing his guilty plea did not comply with the mandates set
forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). On appeal, counsel
for Brown has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), asserting that there were no meritorious grounds for appeal and
requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Brown has not
filed a pro se response.
After a thorough review of the record pursuant
to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
STILWELL, BEATTY and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.